This is John Bercow, MP for Buckingham and Speaker of the House of Commons. Or is he? Because for a man who needs to keep order at Prime Minister's Questions and crucial debates, Bercow is
having a bit of difficulty keeping hold of anything.
It wasn't always so for the Speaker: generally elected comfortably, it's a position that isn't normally affected by the hurly-burly of elections. Douglas Clifton Brown, for example, became Speaker during the Second World War of all times, and stayed on after the Labour landslide despite being Conservative. Likewise, figures like
Bernard Weatherill and
Betty Boothroyd saw relatively long stints at the post pass unhindered, as Thatcher and Blair towered over them.
But then came Michael Martin, and all hell has broken loose since then.
Martin was elected in October 2000, and caused a bit of a stir at the time amongst those who believed that a Conservative MP should have been chosen for the role. He had been chosen because of his support from fellow Labour backbenchers, but from 2006 onwards he started to make a nuisance of himself. Supposed bias towards Tony Blair certainly did not endear him to Conservative MPs or rebel Labour backbenchers.
Then came the expenses.
It is not at all clear whether Martin was aware just how much he was shooting himself in the foot, but to the impartial spectator it appears he was more than happy to carry on reloading. Martin was linked with not one but
four expenses scandals, he then let police search the office of Damian Green (the Conservative spokesman for immigration) without a search warrant.
After that, the writing was on the wall: Douglas Carwell MP tabled a motion of no confidence on 19th May 2009, and
Martin resigned. It was the first time in over 300 years that a Speaker had had to stand down.
Bercow's appointment has been equally controversial: he may be a Conservative, but the Tories do not like him. This is illustrated rather well by Nadine Dorries (above), the Conservative MP for Mid-Bedfordshire, who has
e-mailed the "new kids on the block" in order to warn them about that bully Bercow. The warning goes as follows: "
there are a number of reasons why, since his appointment, Mr Bercow has proven unsuitable in the Speaker's role. Not least, on the occasions during the last session when Mr Bercow found remaining impartial, a crucial quality in the role of Speaker, very difficult, leading to a number of heated exchanges between the Speaker and Conservative MPs."
So. Not really a ringing endorsement.
Fortunately for Bercow, Dorries is generally considered a pain in the neck
by her own party and by others:
her own expenses claims do not exactly give her the high ground, and such campaigns as banning high heels in the office would seem to present her as having her priorities mixed up.
Some comments on Twitter illustrate this point rather well:
If Nadine Dorries thinks new MPs don't know how batty she is, she's more batty than I thought.
Given she can't maintain a Twitter a/c or website it's amazing Nadine Dorries managed to send an email at all.
Just when I thought I couldn't dislike Nadine Dorries more!
Haha, I bet Bercow is delighted Dorries is telling people not to vote for him.
Nadine Dorries wants to get rid of Speaker Bercow? Bercow can't be all that bad then!Judging from those soundbites, it's going to be rather surprising if Bercow actually gets voted out. Even if he is much too liberal for the Daily Mail's liking. And after all, if he can hold off ten opponents
in his own constituency, chances are he'll knock Dorries for six. Otherwise, one suspects this Government has started with a wobble.
The Evening Stanners
Posts
